Episode 28 · 13 September 2026 · 34 min
AI Slop: Who Saves Time, Who Does the Work?

Listen and watch anywhere
Watch
Watch the full episode on YouTubeChapters
- A human fails the Turing test
- Welcome to Adjunct Intelligence
- What are we calling AI slop?
- Inside Infinite Slop
- Would you accept AI-generated learning?
- Who saves time, who inherits the work?
- Students can dislike AI and still use it
- Defining slop with Leon Furze
- AI etiquette and the six-cent insult
- When AI-written feedback gets personal
- Why choosing the slop changes the experience
- Practical effects and invisible craft
- Polished output and missing learning
- Which effort should AI remove?
Show notes
A student complained that an AI voiceover was so bad it needed replacing. The voice belonged to a real person. Somewhere along the way, a human had managed to fail the Turing test in the wrong direction.
That uncomfortable little story opens a much bigger question: what are we actually reacting to when we call something AI slop?
This week, Dale and Nick follow that question through university learning materials, an endless AI television channel, a deeply questionable breakup letter, and the time Nick used AI to deliver feedback to Dale. Apparently, the feedback has been forgotten. The delivery method has not.
At the centre of the conversation is a question about effort: who gets the saving, and who inherits the work? A teacher can generate an activity sheet in seconds. A student can produce an essay just as quickly. Someone still has to read it, make sense of it and deal with the mistakes.
We also explore the difference between choosing AI for yourself and receiving an experience someone else has automated, the human craft hidden inside digital production, and the risk that a polished assignment or learning module can conceal missing learning.
Our closing challenge for higher education: when AI saves time, give some of it back to learners through attention, feedback and support.
00:00 A human fails the Turing test
01:35 Welcome to Adjunct Intelligence
02:49 What are we calling AI slop?
05:59 Inside Infinite Slop
07:50 Would you accept AI-generated learning?
10:51 Who saves time, who inherits the work?
13:44 Students can dislike AI and still use it
15:39 Defining slop with Leon Furze
17:33 AI etiquette and the six-cent insult
18:31 When AI-written feedback gets personal
21:44 Why choosing the slop changes the experience
25:01 Practical effects and invisible craft
29:29 Polished output and missing learning
31:04 Which effort should AI remove?
31:59 Student choice, institutional power and attention
🎙️ Adjunct Intelligence is the weekly briefing for higher-ed professionals who want AI as a cheat code—not a headache.
Every episode:
• Real tests of AI tools in education and professional workflows
• Fast, Monday-morning actions you can actually try
• Clear signal through the noise (no hype, no jargon)
👉 Subscribe on [YouTube] | [Apple Podcasts] | [Spotify]
👉 Share this with a colleague who still says “I’ll figure AI out later”
👉 Join the conversation on LinkedIn with #AdjunctIntelligence
Stay curious. Stay intelligent. Stay the human in the loop.